Avatar for Username

Søg i Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Læs mere

Denne tråd blev arkiveret. Stil et nyt spørgsmål, hvis du har brug for hjælp.

Extremely high CPU usage with minimum open tabs?

  • 3 svar
  • 13 har dette problem
  • 8 visninger
  • Seneste svar af Donatello

Donatello
Donatello
more options

I've come to notice that FF has an ever growing demand on the CPU...even on the start page...you can watch the cpu usage climb.

Nothing else going on, no updating, or downloading...but continues to grow as if I were.

I generally have 3 tabs open...Home (FF), Windows Live, and FB...over a period of 10-15 mins...I see FF using an average of 600+ - over 1 GB of processor power...I resolve this be frequently closing & re-opening FF...but it's not a long term fix.

I've come to notice that FF has an ever growing demand on the CPU...even on the start page...you can watch the cpu usage climb. Nothing else going on, no updating, or downloading...but continues to grow as if I were. I generally have 3 tabs open...Home (FF), Windows Live, and FB...over a period of 10-15 mins...I see FF using an average of 600+ - over 1 GB of processor power...I resolve this be frequently closing & re-opening FF...but it's not a long term fix.

Valgt løsning

Try removing that Bitdefender QuickScan 0.9.9.109 add-on, disabling it might not completely disable it.

Læs dette svar i sammenhæng 👍 2

Alle svar (3)

Matt_G
Matt_G
more options

Hi donatello1969,

Have you looked at our performance troubleshooting section? There is a lot of good information in there that should help.

Hopefully this helps!

the-edmeister
the-edmeister
  • Moderator
more options

Valgt løsning

Try removing that Bitdefender QuickScan 0.9.9.109 add-on, disabling it might not completely disable it.

Donatello
Donatello Spørgsmålsstiller
more options

Disabled Bit Defender...CPU usage dropped dramatically...Cheers...any chance of something low usage, & similar, that Mozilla recommends to replace it?