Pomoc pśepytaś

Glědajśo se wobšudy pomocy. Njenapominajomy was nigda, telefonowy numer zawołaś, SMS pósłaś abo wósobinske informacije pśeraźiś. Pšosym dajśo suspektnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužywanje k wěsći daś“ k wěsći.

Dalšne informacije

sec_error_bad_signature vs. sec_error_untrusted_issuer

  • 2 wótegronje
  • 256 ma toś ten problem
  • 1 naglěd
  • Slědne wótegrono wót SCGR

more options

When attempting to visit my SSL secured server (which uses a self-signed cert) on my local network, I get sec_error_bad_signature with no further usable information. However, when visiting my router config page, which also uses a self-signed cert, I get sec_error_untrusted_issuer which allows me to make an exception.

Is there any way to get a more verbose and useful error message from Firefox so I can figure out exactly why Firefox 3.6 will allow me to accept one self-signed cert while not allowing me to accept another?

When attempting to visit my SSL secured server (which uses a self-signed cert) on my local network, I get sec_error_bad_signature with no further usable information. However, when visiting my router config page, which also uses a self-signed cert, I get sec_error_untrusted_issuer which allows me to make an exception. Is there any way to get a more verbose and useful error message from Firefox so I can figure out exactly why Firefox 3.6 will allow me to accept one self-signed cert while not allowing me to accept another?

Wšykne wótegrona (2)

more options

the same, want to know reason and solution. thanks.

more options

What worked for me was to use a self-signed certificate, instead of using a certificate that was signed by some other self-signed certificate.