Tìm kiếm hỗ trợ

Tránh các lừa đảo về hỗ trợ. Chúng tôi sẽ không bao giờ yêu cầu bạn gọi hoặc nhắn tin đến số điện thoại hoặc chia sẻ thông tin cá nhân. Vui lòng báo cáo hoạt động đáng ngờ bằng cách sử dụng tùy chọn "Báo cáo lạm dụng".

Tìm hiểu thêm

Archive behaving oddly: applying mixed rules

  • 2 trả lời
  • 1 gặp vấn đề này
  • 4 lượt xem
  • Trả lời mới nhất được viết bởi KiDy

more options

I have configured the archive mails in the Archive folder for the account, and under 'Options' I have selected 'A single folder' and ticked 'Keep existing folder structure...'

When launching an archive action, the folder structure is created properly and MOST of the mails are archived in the relevant subfolders, but some files are archived as if I had not checked the 'Keep existing folder structure...' but instead just selected 'Yerly archived folders'.

It happens within same launch of the Archive action.

I have tried to review the characteristics of the files that are properly archived in the folder tree and those archived according to year. I cannot figure out what is governing how the mails are archived.

Am I missing something?

I have configured the archive mails in the Archive folder for the account, and under 'Options' I have selected 'A single folder' and ticked 'Keep existing folder structure...' When launching an archive action, the folder structure is created properly and MOST of the mails are archived in the relevant subfolders, but some files are archived as if I had not checked the 'Keep existing folder structure...' but instead just selected 'Yerly archived folders'. It happens within same launch of the Archive action. I have tried to review the characteristics of the files that are properly archived in the folder tree and those archived according to year. I cannot figure out what is governing how the mails are archived. Am I missing something?

Được chỉnh sửa bởi KiDy vào

Tất cả các câu trả lời (2)

more options

Perhaps https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668215

See especially comment 42

more options

Wayne Mery said

Perhaps https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668215 See especially comment 42

Thanks, but both identities were already set up correctly/identically.