搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Uh-oh. Do Bcc: recipients all show up on everyone's screen?

  • 2 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 最后回复者为 Electrojim

more options

Running Thunderbird 128.2.3esr under Windows 10, I just noticed something for the first time. I sent a broadcast message to myself, but included four friends under Bcc:. When I got my own copy of the email, from the address on the To: line, I see that the Bcc: list is visible, as shown in the attached image. Is this JUST on my received copy of the message, or is everyone's name 'in the clear?'

Thinking that my outgoing message might have been cached-and-used or something, I went into my Gmail Web account and looked at the message as received by Google's servers. Sure enough, the 'blind' (ostensibly hidden!) names show up there as well, so I'm assuming that the Bcc: function may not be doing its job. Either that, or the primary (To:) recipient sees the Bcc: list in the clear, and listed Bcc: recipients won't, although I don't recall Thunderbird working this way in the past. But if it does, that's okay, just that Windows Live Mail, my previous client, didn't.

Running Thunderbird 128.2.3esr under Windows 10, I just noticed something for the first time. I sent a broadcast message to myself, but included four friends under Bcc:. When I got my own copy of the email, from the address on the To: line, I see that the Bcc: list is visible, as shown in the attached image. Is this JUST on my received copy of the message, or is everyone's name 'in the clear?' Thinking that my outgoing message might have been cached-and-used or something, I went into my Gmail Web account and looked at the message as received by Google's servers. Sure enough, the 'blind' (ostensibly hidden!) names show up there as well, so I'm assuming that the Bcc: function may not be doing its job. Either that, or the primary (To:) recipient sees the Bcc: list in the clear, and listed Bcc: recipients won't, although I don't recall Thunderbird working this way in the past. But if it does, that's okay, just that Windows Live Mail, my previous client, didn't.
已附加屏幕截图

被采纳的解决方案

is the from: an to: gmail address the same? I ask because Gmail hides the received email and pretends it is the original you send. They also remove anything in the BCC fields and replace it with "undisclosed recipients" resulting on a lot of complaints over the years on this forum about the BCC entries disappearing from the send email.

This is the first time I have ever seen someone says they see BCC names even in the sent folder.

定位到答案原位置 👍 0

所有回复 (2)

more options

选择的解决方案

is the from: an to: gmail address the same? I ask because Gmail hides the received email and pretends it is the original you send. They also remove anything in the BCC fields and replace it with "undisclosed recipients" resulting on a lot of complaints over the years on this forum about the BCC entries disappearing from the send email.

This is the first time I have ever seen someone says they see BCC names even in the sent folder.

有帮助吗?

more options

So, Matt, do I understand you correctly, it's Gmail that sends the original back to the sender? I made the test using a couple of other email accounts that I have, and the Bcc: recipients did NOT show up in either the message or the header as received through those accounts in Thunderbird. But the one I got on the same Gmail account I sent it out on did indeed look very much like the original, in that the Bcc: recipients were there in the message and in the header. So the secret of who-all got the 'blind' message is safe, despite one's own message received appearing to tattle. Thanks for the explanation.

Oh, and yes, the Bcc: recipients are in the original outgoing message that's in the Thunderbird Sent folder. I would expect this to be the case, although I never paid attention before.

由Electrojim于修改

有帮助吗?

我要提问

您需要登录才能回复。如果您还没账号,可以提出新问题