Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Hierdie gesprek is in die argief. Vra asseblief 'n nuwe vraag as jy hulp nodig het.

Thunderbird, numbered list in combination with ident

  • 1 antwoord
  • 1 het hierdie probleem
  • 8 views
  • Laaste antwoord deur Toad-Hall

m.vdsluis
m.vdsluis
more options

Hi, In Thunderbird, if you use a numbered list with text indentation to indicate subnumbers, the result is not correct.

1. Verbeterpunten: kijk nog even bij het verslag van 27 januari 2020 wat ook bla....... 2. De wedstrijddatums: 

       1. Laaxum:
       2. Oudega
       3. Stavoren
       4. Hindeloopen

5. Test1 6. Test2 at the beginning of line "1. Laaxum" I did a ident and Thunderbird starts that line with number 1. That is correct But when I ident back after "4 Hindeloopen" it would be normal that the line "Test1" continue's with 3 and not with 5. When jou double click on a line with a number 'list properties' is opened. But it is not possible to change the number. Is there a possibility to change de line numbers ore is it a bug?

Hi, In Thunderbird, if you use a numbered list with text indentation to indicate subnumbers, the result is not correct. 1. Verbeterpunten: kijk nog even bij het verslag van 27 januari 2020 wat ook bla....... 2. De wedstrijddatums: 1. Laaxum: 2. Oudega 3. Stavoren 4. Hindeloopen 5. Test1 6. Test2 at the beginning of line "1. Laaxum" I did a ident and Thunderbird starts that line with number 1. That is correct But when I ident back after "4 Hindeloopen" it would be normal that the line "Test1" continue's with 3 and not with 5. When jou double click on a line with a number 'list properties' is opened. But it is not possible to change the number. Is there a possibility to change de line numbers ore is it a bug?

All Replies (1)

Toad-Hall
Toad-Hall
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

Yes it is a bug. There seems to be some share of code with Firefox and so need to bare in mind that although bug is reported, it may be dependent on other bug fixes first. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1611861 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1636766