Avatar for Username

Търсене в помощните статии

Избягвайте измамите при поддръжката. Никога няма да ви помолим да се обадите или изпратите SMS на телефонен номер или да споделите лична информация. Моля, докладвайте подозрителна активност на "Докладване за злоупотреба".

Научете повече

Тази тема беше архивирана. Моля, задайте нов въпрос ако имате нужда от помощ.

Bug in Plugin Check's status report is a security problem

  • 2 отговора
  • 1 има този проблем
  • 7 изгледи
  • Последен отговор от n0diamond

n0diamond
n0diamond
more options

Plugin Status (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/) says "Java(TM) Platform SE 7 U65" "Up to Date 10.65.2.20". This is wrong. I have already started installing U67 because U65 is obsolete. The false report likely persuades users not to update.

Plugin Status also says "Java Deployment Toolkit 7.0.650.20" "Up to Date 10.65.2.20". I don't know yet if that is true or not. If the Platform update doesn't also update the Deployment Toolkit then I'll try to find that update. This is a big security problem because a different page reports that Java Deployment Toolkit 7.0.650.20 has a known vulnerability.

Plugin Status (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/) says "Java(TM) Platform SE 7 U65" "Up to Date 10.65.2.20". This is wrong. I have already started installing U67 because U65 is obsolete. The false report likely persuades users not to update. Plugin Status also says "Java Deployment Toolkit 7.0.650.20" "Up to Date 10.65.2.20". I don't know yet if that is true or not. If the Platform update doesn't also update the Deployment Toolkit then I'll try to find that update. This is a big security problem because a different page reports that Java Deployment Toolkit 7.0.650.20 has a known vulnerability.

Всички отговори (2)

guigs
guigs
more options

There is a bug on file for that, I would track the changes there: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1052877

n0diamond
n0diamond Задаващият въпроса
more options

There are several bugs in that bug report and it's still buggy. Thank you for pointing me to it though.