Търсене в помощните статии

Избягвайте измамите при поддръжката. Никога няма да ви помолим да се обадите или изпратите SMS на телефонен номер или да споделите лична информация. Моля, докладвайте подозрителна активност на "Докладване за злоупотреба".

Научете повече

Can't install Firefox on Samsung Galaxy Gio S5660

  • 6 отговора
  • 3 имат този проблем
  • 1 изглед
  • Последен отговор от Random2

more options

From Firefox 17, you added official support for ARMv6 devices and my Galaxy Gio is indeed included in the list. Anyway when I go to Google Play it still says my device isn't supported (same with the current version 18.0) and I can't install it. I tried both from the phone and activating the "purchase" from PC. I downloaded the browser from official mozilla servers and installed through miniSD installation, I can confirm it works perfectly. Is it a Google issue? Will it be fixed on the Google store? Thanks.

From Firefox 17, you added official support for ARMv6 devices and my Galaxy Gio is indeed included in the list. Anyway when I go to Google Play it still says my device isn't supported (same with the current version 18.0) and I can't install it. I tried both from the phone and activating the "purchase" from PC. I downloaded the browser from official mozilla servers and installed through miniSD installation, I can confirm it works perfectly. Is it a Google issue? Will it be fixed on the Google store? Thanks.

Всички отговори (6)

more options
more options

That's what I did for version 17, but that's not the best way to solve a problem... I'd like to download it directly from Google Play in order to get auto-updates along with all my other apps.

more options

I think you need to update your android

more options

Mmm nope, neither this one. It's said to support Android 2.2 and above, the last official for my phone is Android 2.3.6.

more options

The Gio has 512 MB of storage, according to gsmarena the phone has 278 MB of RAM. Which is below our minimum specs.

Променено на от Kevin

more options

Oh that's true! So theorically you should exclude it from the compatibility list ...