Avatar for Username

Prohledat stránky podpory

Vyhněte se podvodům. Za účelem poskytnutí podpory vás nikdy nežádáme, abyste zavolali nebo poslali SMS na nějaké telefonní číslo nebo abyste sdělili své osobní údaje. Jakékoliv podezřelé chování nám prosím nahlaste pomocí odkazu „Nahlásit zneužití“.

Zjistit více

Toto vlákno bylo archivováno. Pokud potřebujete pomoci, založte prosím nový dotaz.

What does the red text mean when I view the Page Source of a page I am developing?

littlejohnnyhugo
littlejohnnyhugo
more options

I am using Dreamweaver 8 to develop a simple web page. When I view the source code in Firefox, it marks mistakes (i think) in red text, like if i forgot to close some code. However, it also marks all the /'s red that Dreamweaver puts before closing a section of code. You can see my page at acoustiyah.com. View the page source in Firefox and you'll see what I mean. I can code this by hand without those slashes, but do I need to do that? Why are those forward slashes red? Thanks

I am using Dreamweaver 8 to develop a simple web page. When I view the source code in Firefox, it marks mistakes (i think) in red text, like if i forgot to close some code. However, it also marks all the /'s red that Dreamweaver puts before closing a section of code. You can see my page at acoustiyah.com. View the page source in Firefox and you'll see what I mean. I can code this by hand without those slashes, but do I need to do that? Why are those forward slashes red? Thanks

Všechny odpovědi (2)

Scott Plunkett
Scott Plunkett
more options

This is only because Firefox does not believe those should be there. If you right click on the red lined letter or word and click add to dictionary the problem will not occur again.

Thanks For using Firefox!

- Scott

littlejohnnyhugo
littlejohnnyhugo Autor dotazu
more options

Thanks Scott, So those slashes will not cause a problem in Google search rankings or something like that? There must be some reason that Firefox doesn't like them, right? Or is it just because the Firefox dictionary isn't expanded enough yet? 

- ljh