Important Notice: We're experiencing email notification issues. If you've posted a question in the community forums recently, please check your profile manually for responses while we're working to fix this.

On Monday the 3rd of March, around 5pm UTC (9am PT) users may experience a brief period of downtime while one of our underlying services is under maintenance.

Søg i Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Læs mere

Sorry I will not be upgrading to 57 because it blocks running Noscript and Flashblock. That is more important to me that MORE SPEED

  • 2 svar
  • 1 har dette problem
  • 1 visning
  • Seneste svar af James

more options

Sorry I will not be upgrading to 57 because it blocks running Noscript and Flashblock. That is more important to me that MORE SPEED

Sorry I will not be upgrading to 57 because it blocks running Noscript and Flashblock. That is more important to me that MORE SPEED

Alle svar (2)

more options

Hmmm, seems like the name Flashblock is misleading as Wikipedia lists it as a content filtering extension and it doesn't even block Flash content as the name would suggest but rather "allows users to prevent page elements, such as HTML object tag browser plug-ins and advertisements, from being displayed." AFAIK this same thing can be achieved via uBlock Origin's element picker. Much more powerful.

NoScript is in the process of being converted into a WebExtension and will be available soon.

more options

Valgt løsning