Etsi tuesta

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Lue lisää

Recent Mozilla upgrade vs recent Wordpress upgrade?

  • 23 vastausta
  • 5 henkilöllä on sama ongelma
  • 2 näyttöä
  • Viimeisin kirjoittaja springheel

more options

I will try to be brief, but once again I am having some kind of conflict with WP & Mozilla; both of which took updates recently. I have included a screenshot of WP new post page in both IE & Mozilla. Didn't see the point of dragging in other browsers. As you can see--the page renders properly in IE but not Mozilla.

The last time this happened, I was told it was tikd by WP it was a Java issue--and yet--the page rendered properly before the recent java update, regardless that Mozilla wasn't going to support it on my 62 bit machine. I might add, that I also made a late post on this blog following the recent update to Mozilla 57.

That said, the last time this page displayed as such was almost a notification that I needed to upgrade the Wordpress desktop application, accordingly, I opened said application and yes--there was an update of which I did download and install. Consequently the page reders normally in that application, but has yet to render normally in Mozilla, and yet it also renders normally in IE. I don't doubt that it will probably render normally in Chrome as well if only because, when I have issues like this, there is usually an issue with Mozilla/Wordpress, that is to say--therein lays the conflict.

I will duplicate this post in the Wordpress forum. It matters not to me who or what is causing the conflict, I would simply like the page to render properly in Mozilla as it does in IE, regardless that I can use the Wordpress desktop application to make new posts. Short of installing both upgrades, I have done nothing more than reboot my machine.

Thank you.

I will try to be brief, but once again I am having some kind of conflict with WP & Mozilla; both of which took updates recently. I have included a screenshot of WP new post page in both IE & Mozilla. Didn't see the point of dragging in other browsers. As you can see--the page renders properly in IE but not Mozilla. The last time this happened, I was told it was tikd by WP it was a Java issue--and yet--the page rendered properly before the recent java update, regardless that Mozilla wasn't going to support it on my 62 bit machine. I might add, that I also made a late post on this blog following the recent update to Mozilla 57. That said, the last time this page displayed as such was almost a notification that I needed to upgrade the Wordpress desktop application, accordingly, I opened said application and yes--there was an update of which I did download and install. Consequently the page reders normally in that application, but has yet to render normally in Mozilla, and yet it also renders normally in IE. I don't doubt that it will probably render normally in Chrome as well if only because, when I have issues like this, there is usually an issue with Mozilla/Wordpress, that is to say--therein lays the conflict. I will duplicate this post in the Wordpress forum. It matters not to me who or what is causing the conflict, I would simply like the page to render properly in Mozilla as it does in IE, regardless that I can use the Wordpress desktop application to make new posts. Short of installing both upgrades, I have done nothing more than reboot my machine. Thank you.
Liitetyt ruutukaappaukset

Valittu ratkaisu

The WP IT had me put up a screenshot of the Error tab in the console,

I believe I posted that error.

He had me enter localStorage.clear() at the bottome of the page and press enter. I got a return message saying that the source was undefined.

however, and maybe this is not an immediate take. I refreshed the page and in the warnings tab on the console (I seem to have a short memory after all this) there was a message saying the page won't render because there was a tracking protection enabled, even though when I go to the address bar, I had done this the other day, but today, for some odd reason, there was a dialogue that admitted Firefox was blocking elements of the page and today, this time, it gave me the option to allow these elements to display, in effect, I will hope, whitelist it over all. I check regularly to see that it has been whitelisted, but I want to assume that now that I have done this, it won't block these elements anymore.

Fingers Crossed.

I have no idea why that wasn't displaying before.

On the other hand, I did take a Windows update this morning. That may or may not have had some effect. Though I tend to doubt it; Windows has been updating on Thurs lately, except at the first of the month when it updates on Tues.

Lue tämä vastaus kontekstissaan 👍 0

Kaikki vastaukset (4)

more options

I think the STOP message is a warning from Firefox not to execute code from strangers in the web console.

more options

Valittu ratkaisu

The WP IT had me put up a screenshot of the Error tab in the console,

I believe I posted that error.

He had me enter localStorage.clear() at the bottome of the page and press enter. I got a return message saying that the source was undefined.

however, and maybe this is not an immediate take. I refreshed the page and in the warnings tab on the console (I seem to have a short memory after all this) there was a message saying the page won't render because there was a tracking protection enabled, even though when I go to the address bar, I had done this the other day, but today, for some odd reason, there was a dialogue that admitted Firefox was blocking elements of the page and today, this time, it gave me the option to allow these elements to display, in effect, I will hope, whitelist it over all. I check regularly to see that it has been whitelisted, but I want to assume that now that I have done this, it won't block these elements anymore.

Fingers Crossed.

I have no idea why that wasn't displaying before.

On the other hand, I did take a Windows update this morning. That may or may not have had some effect. Though I tend to doubt it; Windows has been updating on Thurs lately, except at the first of the month when it updates on Tues.

more options

'Background Tabs

Firefox 29 started the trend of just having a thin line between background tabs rather than being individually shaped. Do you want to try a custom style rule to add shape to them?

Yes! I liked the rounded corners better than the square ones. Sounds silly but I do, it gives the browser character. Honestly, and even though I hate Chrome, and I can't be sure it still looks the same because I never use it, I liked the Firefox browser was more pleasing to the eye when it took on that type of look.

And while I'm at it, I have to add--the so-called "themes," being nor more than "letterheads," to me are pointless and show a lack of imagination. However, I do realize people like these things. I prefer simple, basic, light font on dark themes, for obvious reasons.

You have no idea how Sylish saved my eyesight and sanity. My Gooble is black & white, so is Wiki. Youtube, when they recently changed their layout--offered a 'dark' theme. So, someone out there is paying attention.

Honestly, I like the default theme, except for the square tabs (which is being a little pissy) but contrast isn't enough for my eyesight and I think it may be because the default colors on my machine are black & white, and so I may not be seeing the same definition that you are.

I applied the rule to the icons on the address bar search, However, there was something about the address bar search that was irritating me the other day and I changed it back to the having a separate search. That said, I have already performed that same hack when Mozilla started using icons way back, however, and the hack is still visible in About:Config, and yet it does not apply. I would like that back to text in the drop-down menu, as I'm sure many people will.

The icons simply aren't that recognizable unless I am using them regularly and am more familiar with that site, like say--Amazon, or Google. But I do like my list of alternates, I simply don't use them as often and so what I have is a whole lot of icons of which I do not really know what they are. I would like the drop-down text menu. Please. If at all possible.

I took a look at your CSS page. I wish I could write code and apply CSS but I never learned, I only learned enough from themeing Myspace pages to do simple hacks. I learned a lot about html from themeing my Myspace page, but they were relatively simple hacks. I just stared at the code until l began to see patterns.

Of course now, there are free text editors of which you can use to code your text all over the web, WP's being one of them.

I would like to learn/know a little more about how I can apply what you are doing, have done, to my Firefox browser. I admit, some of the changes I am not crazy about. I like the idea of transposing the elements of the menu bar to the side bar, but I still feel you should at the page style element to it, that is to say if Mozilla wants to be completest, we do use that feature and I can't say that it wouldn't be nice to be able to do away with the old Menu bar altogether. Then again, it's hard to say which is more assessable.

I understand the idea of the overflow, however, if there is no need for it, why show it. It doesn't show in the tabs if they aren't overflowing. I should have the option to remove it, or it should remove itself automatically like the one in the tabs.

These are small griefs, but they make a big difference, at least for me.

At any rate, thank you for your help & patience. I would like to learn more about customizing the browser to fit my individual needs, if possible.

more options

Been doing some research. What do you know about this:

https://hacks.mozilla.org/2017/09/firefox-quantum-developer-edition-fastest-firefox-ever/

Firefox Quantum Developer Edition

Is this an entirely new browser, that is to say--a stand alone version of Firefox, or does it overwrite Firefox Quantum altogether.

  1. 1
  2. 2