Avatar for Username

Rechercher dans l’assistance

Évitez les escroqueries à l’assistance. Nous ne vous demanderons jamais d’appeler ou d’envoyer un SMS à un numéro de téléphone ou de partager des informations personnelles. Veuillez signaler toute activité suspecte en utilisant l’option « Signaler un abus ».

En savoir plus

Ce sujet de discussion a été archivé. Veuillez poser une nouvelle question si vous avez besoin d’aide.

PDFs loading differently between development and production server while using pdf.js - please help.

  • 2 réponses
  • 3 ont ce problème
  • 1 vue
  • Dernière réponse par ardnirum

ardnirum
ardnirum
more options

Hi

We are using pdf.js in our application to display thousands of PDFs.

In the development server (running on CentOS), when we access PDFs, the viewer shows the first page, while the rest of the pages load/download.

Whereas, in the staging & production servers(RedHat OS), the viewer waits for all the pages to download before showing the first page.

What could be the reason? I am not able to believe that it would be OS based.

Please help.

Thanks Gopal

Hi We are using pdf.js in our application to display thousands of PDFs. In the development server (running on CentOS), when we access PDFs, the viewer shows the first page, while the rest of the pages load/download. Whereas, in the staging & production servers(RedHat OS), the viewer waits for all the pages to download before showing the first page. What could be the reason? I am not able to believe that it would be OS based. Please help. Thanks Gopal

Toutes les réponses (2)

the-edmeister
the-edmeister
  • Moderator
more options

Same version of PDF.js on both? v 1.2.109 is the current "Stable" version Beyond that see the PDF.js Project page: https://mozilla.github.io/pdf.js/

ardnirum
ardnirum Auteur de la question
more options

Sorry, I dont have the version numbers with me right now. But i am very sure that the same version is running on both the servers. I have compared the source and there are no changes. Hope this helps. Thanks for looking into it.

regards Gopal