Avatar for Username

Rechercher dans l’assistance

Évitez les escroqueries à l’assistance. Nous ne vous demanderons jamais d’appeler ou d’envoyer un SMS à un numéro de téléphone ou de partager des informations personnelles. Veuillez signaler toute activité suspecte en utilisant l’option « Signaler un abus ».

En savoir plus

Ce sujet de discussion a été archivé. Veuillez poser une nouvelle question si vous avez besoin d’aide.

Firefox is very slow with masking images and animations in general.

  • 1 réponse
  • 1 a ce problème
  • 5 vues
  • Dernière réponse par user1929

WessamSharaf
WessamSharaf
more options

I am using animation on SVG elements (only paths) (Just by toggling the visibility property of paths very frequently with JavaScript). The SVG has a background image. Some of the paths that are displayed must have the background image on the stroke (to appear as if they are erasing paths). I use the masking capability of SVG to do this.

There are too many paths with or without background image on the stroke. This works well in Chrome. However, in FireFox, the animation process becomes very slow while displaying an erasing path (i.e a path with the background image on the stroke). Is there any other way to display an erasing path to which Firefox responds well.

I am using animation on SVG elements (only paths) (Just by toggling the visibility property of paths very frequently with JavaScript). The SVG has a background image. Some of the paths that are displayed must have the background image on the stroke (to appear as if they are erasing paths). I use the masking capability of SVG to do this. There are too many paths with or without background image on the stroke. This works well in Chrome. However, in FireFox, the animation process becomes very slow while displaying an erasing path (i.e a path with the background image on the stroke). Is there any other way to display an erasing path to which Firefox responds well.

Toutes les réponses (1)

user1929
user1929
more options

If you have an example page that does this, could you open a bug report at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ ?