Avatar for Username

Rechercher dans l’assistance

Évitez les escroqueries à l’assistance. Nous ne vous demanderons jamais d’appeler ou d’envoyer un SMS à un numéro de téléphone ou de partager des informations personnelles. Veuillez signaler toute activité suspecte en utilisant l’option « Signaler un abus ».

En savoir plus

Ce sujet de discussion a été archivé. Veuillez poser une nouvelle question si vous avez besoin d’aide.

Since new update, new tabs open behind current tab instead of behind marked tabs

  • 2 réponses
  • 0 a ce problème
  • 7 vues
  • Dernière réponse par Sneed

Sneed
Sneed
more options

Hey there!

Since the newest update (I think), whenever I select multiple tabs and attempt to open a new one via pressing the middle mouse button (or the MMB together with shift), the new tab opens behind the current open tab instead of the marked tabs.

For example: If I mark two tabs and have the left tab open, pressing the MMB on the + symbol would normally open a new tab to the right of those two tabs. Now, however, it opens the tab inbetween the two selected tabs.

Is there a way to change this back?

Hey there! Since the newest update (I think), whenever I select multiple tabs and attempt to open a new one via pressing the middle mouse button (or the MMB together with shift), the new tab opens behind the current open tab instead of the marked tabs. For example: If I mark two tabs and have the left tab open, pressing the MMB on the + symbol would normally open a new tab to the right of those two tabs. Now, however, it opens the tab inbetween the two selected tabs. Is there a way to change this back?

Toutes les réponses (2)

zeroknight
zeroknight
more options

Multiple selected tabs no longer affects where tabs open since version 115 (Bug 1791231). An extension could possibly replicate the old behavior but it is highly specific.

Sneed
Sneed Auteur de la question
more options

zeroknight said
Multiple selected tabs no longer affects where tabs open since version 115 (Bug 1791231). An extension could possibly replicate the old behavior but it is highly specific.

Ah, I see. So is that a bug that will be fixed in the future, or did Mozilla think that it was a bug and ""fix"" it? Either way, thank you for the information.