Important Notice: We're experiencing email notification issues. If you've posted a question in the community forums recently, please check your profile manually for responses while we're working to fix this.

On Monday the 3rd of March, around 5pm UTC (9am PT) users may experience a brief period of downtime while one of our underlying services is under maintenance.

Avatar for Username

Eheka Pytyvõha

Emboyke pytyvõha apovai. Ndorojeruremo’ãi ehenói térã eñe’ẽmondóvo pumbyrýpe ha emoherakuãvo marandu nemba’etéva. Emombe’u tembiapo imarãkuaáva ko “Marandu iñañáva” rupive.

Kuaave

Passwords user name = "no name"

  • 2 Mbohovái
  • 0 oguereko ko apañuãi
  • 4 Hecha
  • Mbohovái ipaháva TyDraniu

dick.koehl
dick.koehl
more options

Windows 10, 22H2, 19045.5371 Firefox 128.6.0esr (64-bit)

I want to know if Firefox, passwords, user name = (no name) is a legitimate entry or a security hole. For the "offending" entries, there are several, there is a (no name) :: {password} and a valid name :: (password), including {your site}. Is it safe / logical to delete the "no name" entry?

Windows 10, 22H2, 19045.5371 Firefox 128.6.0esr (64-bit) I want to know if Firefox, passwords, user name = (no name) is a legitimate entry or a security hole. For the "offending" entries, there are several, there is a (no name) :: {password} and a valid name :: (password), including {your site}. Is it safe / logical to delete the "no name" entry?

Opaite Mbohovái (2)

dick.koehl
dick.koehl Porandu apoha
more options

correction many entries have a "no name :: {password}" plus "valid name" :: {password}. Mozilla has ONLY a "no name :: { password}"

¿Imba’eporãva?

TyDraniu
TyDraniu
  • Top 25 Contributor
more options

There are two different login forms on these websites, so it's OK and it should stay like this.

¿Imba’eporãva?

Eporandumína

Nde eikéke nde mba’etepe embohovái hag̃ua ñe’ẽmondo. Ikatúpa, emoñepyrũ peteĩ porandu, ndereguerekói gueteriramo nemba’ete.