Avatar for Username

Pretraži podršku

Izbjegni prevare podrške. Nikad te nećemo tražiti da nas nazoveš, da nam pošalješ telefonski broj ili da podijeliš osobne podatke. Prijavi sumnjive radnje pomoću opcije „Prijavi zlouporabu”.

Saznaj više

Ova tema je arhivirana. Postavi novo pitanje ako trebaš pomoć.

Debugger source list pane not organized by directory

  • 2 odgovora
  • 1 ima ovaj problem
  • 1 prikaz
  • Posljednji odgovor od sammmuel

sammmuel
sammmuel
more options

The debugger source list pane is not organized by collapsible directory tree for me. This reference page clearly says that it should and has a screen shot.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger/UI_Tour#Source_list_pane

Is there an option I'm missing? It is much more convenient to have the script organized like in Chrome.

Firefox Developer Edition 55 Archlinux

The debugger source list pane is not organized by collapsible directory tree for me. This reference page clearly says that it should and has a screen shot. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger/UI_Tour#Source_list_pane Is there an option I'm missing? It is much more convenient to have the script organized like in Chrome. Firefox Developer Edition 55 Archlinux
Priložene slike ekrana

Izabrano rješenje

cor-el,

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question and attaching the screen shot. I tried the nightly 56.0a1 and you are correct. It seems to be working very smoothly and the UI is a bit nicer so I think I will try using it for awhile.

Thanks!

Pročitaj ovaj odgovor u kontekstu 👍 0

Svi odgovori (2)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

I see this feature in the current Nightly build (56.0a1), so you will have to wait until this lands in the Developer Edition.

The documents on the MDN website usually reflect the state of the latest Nightly builds version and not all features may be present in other releases.

sammmuel
sammmuel Vlasnik pitanja
more options

Odabrano rješenje

cor-el,

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question and attaching the screen shot. I tried the nightly 56.0a1 and you are correct. It seems to be working very smoothly and the UI is a bit nicer so I think I will try using it for awhile.

Thanks!