Avatar for Username

Pretraži podršku

Izbjegni prevare podrške. Nikad te nećemo tražiti da nas nazoveš, da nam pošalješ telefonski broj ili da podijeliš osobne podatke. Prijavi sumnjive radnje pomoću opcije „Prijavi zlouporabu”.

Saznaj više

Ova tema je arhivirana. Postavi novo pitanje ako trebaš pomoć.

Unread emails not being hilighted now in 91.1.0

  • 4 odgovora
  • 1 ima ovaj problem
  • 3 prikaza
  • Posljednji odgovor od Antony

willy6560
willy6560
more options

In many cases, starting with 91.1.0 (as of 9Sept21), unread emails sometimes loose their displayed highlight. This didn't happen in previous versions.

As you can see in the attached image, the root email folder example (highlighted in red) shows 13 unread emails, yet in the email's content listing (to the right), only the Inbox is highlighted with one email. The remainder of emails (12) are not highlighted. This condition isn't always seen, but it does occur. It just makes scanning the email folder contents more difficult.

Thanks, Bill

In many cases, starting with 91.1.0 (as of 9Sept21), unread emails sometimes loose their displayed highlight. This didn't happen in previous versions. As you can see in the attached image, the root email folder example (highlighted in red) shows 13 unread emails, yet in the email's content listing (to the right), only the Inbox is highlighted with one email. The remainder of emails (12) are not highlighted. This condition isn't always seen, but it does occur. It just makes scanning the email folder contents more difficult. Thanks, Bill
Priložene slike ekrana

Svi odgovori (4)

sfhowes
sfhowes
  • Top 25 Contributor
more options

Do you have Bitdefender? Its anti-spam feature can do this.

willy6560
willy6560 Vlasnik pitanja
more options

No, I'm running Spectrum's Security Suite.

sfhowes
sfhowes
  • Top 25 Contributor
more options

The Bitdefender issue is different from yours. In your case, the number of unread messages in subfolders is shown, but the subfolder name isn't highlighted in blue. I don't know if this is a regression in 91 or a deliberate design change.

Antony
Antony
more options

As a user, I consider this new behavior as a regression.. not by design.