We're calling on all EU-based Mozillians with iOS or iPadOS devices to help us monitor Apple’s new browser choice screens. Join the effort to hold Big Tech to account!

Pretraži podršku

Izbjegni prevare podrške. Nikad te nećemo tražiti da nas nazoveš, da nam pošalješ telefonski broj ili da podijeliš osobne podatke. Prijavi sumnjive radnje pomoću opcije „Prijavi zlouporabu”.

Saznaj više

Extremely high CPU usage with minimum open tabs?

  • 3 odgovora
  • 13 ima ovaj problem
  • 8 prikaza
  • Posljednji odgovor od Donatello

more options

I've come to notice that FF has an ever growing demand on the CPU...even on the start page...you can watch the cpu usage climb.

Nothing else going on, no updating, or downloading...but continues to grow as if I were.

I generally have 3 tabs open...Home (FF), Windows Live, and FB...over a period of 10-15 mins...I see FF using an average of 600+ - over 1 GB of processor power...I resolve this be frequently closing & re-opening FF...but it's not a long term fix.

I've come to notice that FF has an ever growing demand on the CPU...even on the start page...you can watch the cpu usage climb. Nothing else going on, no updating, or downloading...but continues to grow as if I were. I generally have 3 tabs open...Home (FF), Windows Live, and FB...over a period of 10-15 mins...I see FF using an average of 600+ - over 1 GB of processor power...I resolve this be frequently closing & re-opening FF...but it's not a long term fix.

Izabrano rješenje

Try removing that Bitdefender QuickScan 0.9.9.109 add-on, disabling it might not completely disable it.

Pročitaj ovaj odgovor u kontekstu 👍 2

Svi odgovori (3)

more options

Hi donatello1969,

Have you looked at our performance troubleshooting section? There is a lot of good information in there that should help.

Hopefully this helps!

more options

Odabrano rješenje

Try removing that Bitdefender QuickScan 0.9.9.109 add-on, disabling it might not completely disable it.

more options

Disabled Bit Defender...CPU usage dropped dramatically...Cheers...any chance of something low usage, & similar, that Mozilla recommends to replace it?