Important Notice: We're experiencing email notification issues. If you've posted a question in the community forums recently, please check your profile manually for responses while we're working to fix this.

On Monday the 3rd of March, around 5pm UTC (9am PT) users may experience a brief period of downtime while one of our underlying services is under maintenance.

Avatar for Username

Pomoc přepytać

Hladajće so wobšudstwa pomocy. Njenamołwimy was ženje, telefonowe čisło zawołać, SMS pósłać abo wosobinske informacije přeradźić. Prošu zdźělće podhladnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužiwanje zdźělić“.

Dalše informacije

Tuta nitka je so archiwowała. Prošu stajće nowe prašenje, jeli pomoc trjebaće.

Sec-WebSocket-Protocol in websocket handshake response

  • 1 wotmołwa
  • 1 ma tutón problem
  • 2 napohladaj
  • Poslednja wotmołwa wot Gerd

manlm1
manlm1
more options

In Chrome when I make a websocket handshake, if in the request, the "Sec-WebSocket-Protocol" header is specified, then the response from server must also has this header, if not, chrome will not allow to make the connection But in Firefox, the response does not need to have the header. Why Firefox allow this?

Regards, ManLM

In Chrome when I make a websocket handshake, if in the request, the "Sec-WebSocket-Protocol" header is specified, then the response from server must also has this header, if not, chrome will not allow to make the connection But in Firefox, the response does not need to have the header. Why Firefox allow this? Regards, ManLM

Wšě wotmołwy (1)

Gerd
Gerd
more options

It is possible that this is a non-standard header (that is therefor not implemented in FF), or that Firefox' security policies are not as strict.

Most likely this shouldn't cause any problems.