Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Támogatás keresése

Kerülje el a támogatási csalásokat. Sosem kérjük arra, hogy hívjon fel egy telefonszámot vagy osszon meg személyes információkat. Jelentse a gyanús tevékenységeket a „Visszaélés bejelentése” lehetőséggel.

További tudnivalók

A témacsoportot lezárták és archiválták. Tegyen fel új kérdést, ha segítségre van szüksége.

Does the Program Spamfighter works under Thunderbird and if yes, how ?

  • 1 válasz
  • 2 embernek van ilyen problémája
  • 3 megtekintés
  • Utolsó üzenet ettől: Zenos

more options

I have installed the Program Spamfighter to suppress Spam-Messages in Thunderbird, but it didn't work. What can I do ? Under Windows XP and the E-Mail Program Outlook - Express it worked very well.

The other Question is: if Spamfighter dodn't work under Thunderbird, how can I activate the Junk Filter Function ? I only see the Junk-drop behind the messages, but if I press the Delete-button the message will be stored in the normal waste-paper basket and not in the Junk-filter waste-paper basket. the quetion is: what must I do that the Junk messages automatically goes into the Junk-Filter Waste-paper Basket ?

My last question is: what meaning has the Archive-Function. Is it possible to archive Junk-messages so that the Junk-messages next time automatically goes into Junk-filter waste-paper basket, and if yes, what must I do ?

I have installed the Program Spamfighter to suppress Spam-Messages in Thunderbird, but it didn't work. What can I do ? Under Windows XP and the E-Mail Program Outlook - Express it worked very well. The other Question is: if Spamfighter dodn't work under Thunderbird, how can I activate the Junk Filter Function ? I only see the Junk-drop behind the messages, but if I press the Delete-button the message will be stored in the normal waste-paper basket and not in the Junk-filter waste-paper basket. the quetion is: what must I do that the Junk messages automatically goes into the Junk-Filter Waste-paper Basket ? My last question is: what meaning has the Archive-Function. Is it possible to archive Junk-messages so that the Junk-messages next time automatically goes into Junk-filter waste-paper basket, and if yes, what must I do ?

Összes válasz (1)

more options

Here, Thunderbird appears to have built-in support for

Bogofilter DSPAM POPFile SpamAssassin SpamPal

No mention of SpamFighter.

If SpamFighter inserts special headers then you can create a Message Filter to look for them and act on them. You'll probably need to define a custom header term for the Message Filter tool.

The Junk controls in Thunderbird are a separate Bayesian rule-based system and rely on training (i.e. the user marking messages as Junk or Not Junk as appropriate.) No connection with filters or anti-spam tools such as those listed above. Use J or j or right-click|Mark As to set a message's Junk status. The Junk Controls part of account settings provides some adjustments, such as moving manually-marked Junk straight to the Junk folder.

If you use Thunderbird and just keep accumulating messages, the files storing the messages will just get larger and larger, and the process of indexing them and searching them gets slower and slower. Archiving allows less frequently used (i.e. older) messages to be moved out into their own files, so we have a large number of smaller files rather than a small number of huge files. By default, the Archive function stores messages according to the year in their date entries, and archiving can be set to preserve any folder systems you have set up.

I can't see any good reason to send Junk or Trash to Archive; both are by definition designed for messages that aren't useful (unless you're studying and researching spam and junk email). The main point of these folders is to temporarily hold messages that have been identified as suspicious, so you can veto and recover them if incorrectly categorized.