Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Do Firefox settings conflict with extension options?

  • 1 nzaghachinzaghachi
  • 1 nwere nsogbu anwere nsogbu a
  • 7 views
  • Nzaghachi ikpeazụ nke ideato

more options

This is NOT a specific current problem, but a request for general troubleshooting information. I know, both from reading KB articles and bitter experience, that one should not add multiple extensions that have the same purpose - Do Not Track extensions, for instance. My question pertains to FF's internal settings vs. extensions that expand upon them, e.g. the FF Block Pop-ups setting vs. an enhanced Pop-up blocking extension - are they going to conflict/confuse? Should one turn off the FF setting before installing the extension? Do we trust that the extension will change the setting appropriately? Is all this checked before an add-on is approved for the AMO?

This is NOT a specific current problem, but a request for general troubleshooting information. I know, both from reading KB articles and bitter experience, that one should not add multiple extensions that have the same purpose - Do Not Track extensions, for instance. My question pertains to FF's internal settings vs. extensions that expand upon them, e.g. the FF Block Pop-ups setting vs. an enhanced Pop-up blocking extension - are they going to conflict/confuse? Should one turn off the FF setting before installing the extension? Do we trust that the extension will change the setting appropriately? Is all this checked before an add-on is approved for the AMO?

All Replies (1)

more options

Hello r3n3gad3

1.the FF Block Pop-ups setting vs. an enhanced Pop-up blocking extension - are they going to conflict/confuse?

i don't think so(in the specific example)

2.Do we trust that the extension will change the setting appropriately?

for most extensions, yes

3.Is all this checked before an add-on is approved for the AMO?

it must be, but bugs is always present

see also well known problematic extensions


thank you