Important Notice: We're experiencing email notification issues. If you've posted a question in the community forums recently, please check your profile manually for responses while we're working to fix this.

On Monday the 3rd of March, around 5pm UTC (9am PT) users may experience a brief period of downtime while one of our underlying services is under maintenance.

Przeszukaj pomoc

Unikaj oszustw związanych z pomocą.Nigdy nie będziemy prosić Cię o dzwonienie na numer telefonu, wysyłanie SMS-ów ani o udostępnianie danych osobowych. Zgłoś podejrzaną aktywność, korzystając z opcji „Zgłoś nadużycie”.

Więcej informacji

Multiple tabs in one window or multiple windows with fewer tabs?

  • 1 odpowiedź
  • 1 osoba ma ten problem
  • 1 wyświetlenie
  • Ostatnia odpowiedź od guigs

more options

I have 100+ tabs in 7 windows. Routinely. From the viewpoint of performance what is better:

1. One window + TabGroup Manager (Tabs within tabs) + 100 tabs + only used tabs loaded (I have unload tab addon) 2. 7 windows + multiple tabs in each window + only used tabs loaded (I have unload tab addon)

I have 100+ tabs in 7 windows. Routinely. From the viewpoint of performance what is better: 1. One window + TabGroup Manager (Tabs within tabs) + 100 tabs + only used tabs loaded (I have unload tab addon) 2. 7 windows + multiple tabs in each window + only used tabs loaded (I have unload tab addon)

Wszystkie odpowiedzi (1)

more options

I didn't think that tab groups was anymore. From a performance standpoint both use the same memory afaik. about:memory could tell you otherwise.