Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Przeszukaj pomoc

Unikaj oszustw związanych z pomocą.Nigdy nie będziemy prosić Cię o dzwonienie na numer telefonu, wysyłanie SMS-ów ani o udostępnianie danych osobowych. Zgłoś podejrzaną aktywność, korzystając z opcji „Zgłoś nadużycie”.

Więcej informacji

Special Characters on received emails not displaying correctly after update to 78

  • 1 odpowiedź
  • 1 osoba ma ten problem
  • 16 wyświetleń
  • Ostatnia odpowiedź od fosforo1313

more options

Hi

Just noticed that emails with special characters such as â ã ç é and so on, now display as � after update to 78.

If i go to (in the main window) View>Text Encoding, Unicode is selected. If i change it to Western, then the special characters in the selected email displays correctly.

If i select another email, when i go back to the problem email, it no longer displays correctly, and Unicode is selected again.

This happens to emails received before the update to 78 too.

I have changing options in Options>General>Language & Appearance>Fonts & Colors>Advanced and for incoming emails the selected option is Western (ISO-8859-1), and changing this option had no visible results.

Thanks in advance

Hi Just noticed that emails with special characters such as â ã ç é and so on, now display as � after update to 78. If i go to (in the main window) View>Text Encoding, Unicode is selected. If i change it to Western, then the special characters in the selected email displays correctly. If i select another email, when i go back to the problem email, it no longer displays correctly, and Unicode is selected again. This happens to emails received before the update to 78 too. I have changing options in Options>General>Language & Appearance>Fonts & Colors>Advanced and for incoming emails the selected option is Western (ISO-8859-1), and changing this option had no visible results. Thanks in advance

Wszystkie odpowiedzi (1)

more options

Problem still exists after 78.4.3