Important Notice: We're experiencing email notification issues. If you've posted a question in the community forums recently, please check your profile manually for responses while we're working to fix this.

Sök i support

Akta dig för supportbedrägerier: Vi kommer aldrig att be dig att ringa eller skicka ett sms till ett telefonnummer eller dela personlig information. Rapportera misstänkt aktivitet med alternativet "Rapportera missbruk".

Läs mer

I do not like to see that mozilla offers firefox for MAC and also CAMINO browsers.

more options

I like Mozilla. BUT I do NOT like to be offered two browsers for my macbook. WHY am I offered CAMINO and FIREFOX? Does not make sense. Because CAMINO is more adhered to the MAC environ, I suggest you eliminate the other and just rename CAMINO as the version of FIREFOX for Macs! Simple, more economic for you. Because now if I pick CAMINO I am picking a not very well known browser, and some webpages even do not recognize it (like the www.uned.es)

I like Mozilla. BUT I do NOT like to be offered two browsers for my macbook. WHY am I offered CAMINO and FIREFOX? Does not make sense. Because CAMINO is more adhered to the MAC environ, I suggest you eliminate the other and just rename CAMINO as the version of FIREFOX for Macs! Simple, more economic for you. Because now if I pick CAMINO I am picking a not very well known browser, and some webpages even do not recognize it (like the www.uned.es)

Alla svar (1)

more options

You can provide feedback to Mozilla here:
http://hendrix.mozilla.org/

I'm sure the users and developers of the Camino project would disagree with your opinion. And if other people thought like that back in 2002, Firefox might not exist today.