ค้นหาฝ่ายสนับสนุน

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

เรียนรู้เพิ่มเติม

SoGo CalDAV calendars do not show up in Accept Invitation dialog

  • 3 การตอบกลับ
  • 1 คนมีปัญหานี้
  • 25 ครั้งที่ดู
  • ตอบกลับล่าสุดโดย mozilla415

more options

Hi!

I recently moved my calendars to a SOGo instance, and added those to Thunderbird via CalDAV. Generally, everything works just fine - I can see and edit events and tasks.

However, there is one issue: When I'm sent an invitation, I don't see those calendars listed in the "Select calendar" dialog that shows when I click on "Accept".

When I click on "More"->"Save copy", they are displayed.

What I tried/verified: - The calendars are not write-protected. - Each calendar has an associated email address. - Each email address is only associated to a single calendar.

Do you have an idea why Thunderbird doesn't show those calendars in the "Accept" dialog?

Hi! I recently moved my calendars to a SOGo instance, and added those to Thunderbird via CalDAV. Generally, everything works just fine - I can see and edit events and tasks. However, there is one issue: When I'm sent an invitation, I don't see those calendars listed in the "Select calendar" dialog that shows when I click on "Accept". When I click on "More"->"Save copy", they are displayed. What I tried/verified: - The calendars are not write-protected. - Each calendar has an associated email address. - Each email address is only associated to a single calendar. Do you have an idea why Thunderbird doesn't show those calendars in the "Accept" dialog?

การตอบกลับทั้งหมด (3)

more options
Each calendar has an associated email address.

Has the invitation been sent to any of those associated email addresses?

more options

Yes. And invitations with that address have worked previously, before moving the calendars to the SOGo server.

(the calendars are stored under a different domain than said email address, but that has always been the case)

more options

I've filed a bug report, as I don't expect that this behavior is intended: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1828138

(also there appeared another related issue, that is clearly a bug)