ค้นหาฝ่ายสนับสนุน

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

เรียนรู้เพิ่มเติม

google cookies

  • 3 การตอบกลับ
  • 53 คนมีปัญหานี้
  • 3 ครั้งที่ดู
  • ตอบกลับล่าสุดโดย cor-el

more options

All of a sudden, I can't get Google to respond with 100 responses, when appropriate, per page as they have done by my choice for nearly 10 years,. This is a new problem that is only about a month old. Despite my choosing 100, they only come back with 10 per page.

Despite their statement at the bottom of their preferences page, "Note: Setting preferences will not work if you have disabled cookies in your browser.", my cookies are not disabled.

All of a sudden, I can't get Google to respond with 100 responses, when appropriate, per page as they have done by my choice for nearly 10 years,. This is a new problem that is only about a month old. Despite my choosing 100, they only come back with 10 per page. Despite their statement at the bottom of their preferences page, "Note: Setting preferences will not work if you have disabled cookies in your browser.", my cookies are not disabled.

วิธีแก้ปัญหาที่เลือก

This is due to a change at Google. The new instant search feature will only show 10 results.

First turn off instant search, you can turn it off by selecting the option to the right of the search box. Then go into Google settings to change the number of search results.

อ่านคำตอบนี้ในบริบท 👍 6

การตอบกลับทั้งหมด (3)

more options

วิธีแก้ปัญหาที่เลือก

This is due to a change at Google. The new instant search feature will only show 10 results.

First turn off instant search, you can turn it off by selecting the option to the right of the search box. Then go into Google settings to change the number of search results.

more options

Thanks so much, Tony!

If Google had put out some notice that the "Instant Search" which I'm guessing they implemented with no notification and without choice as well, I missed it.

Thanks again.