Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

feedback, not a question

  • 1 phendula
  • 1 inayo le ngxaki
  • 14 views
  • Impendulo yokugqibela ngu sfhowes

more options

This is not a question, but some feedback I've been wanting to give for a while. When I reply to a message, Thunderbird thankfully does not spell check the letter I am replying to, just my own content. However, Thunderbird prefaces the original content with something like: On 1/13/2020 8:26 AM, CJ Girard (Lightspeed Retail Support) wrote: Spell check inevitably flags the name of the of person I'm replying to. There is no need for this, and it should know better. Can some scripting be added to the spell check function that causes it to overlook that automatically generated line that prefaces the replied-to text? If the reply message included that automatically generated line in the "reply" text then it would be ignored. I hope that all makes sense.

This is not a question, but some feedback I've been wanting to give for a while. When I reply to a message, Thunderbird thankfully does not spell check the letter I am replying to, just my own content. However, Thunderbird prefaces the original content with something like: On 1/13/2020 8:26 AM, CJ Girard (Lightspeed Retail Support) wrote: Spell check inevitably flags the name of the of person I'm replying to. There is no need for this, and it should know better. Can some scripting be added to the spell check function that causes it to overlook that automatically generated line that prefaces the replied-to text? If the reply message included that automatically generated line in the "reply" text then it would be ignored. I hope that all makes sense.

All Replies (1)

more options