Why did you spent time for integration of Pocket and not in solving the "Logjam"-vulberability?
Why was the logjam-problem not solved? I think it's more impotant than the pocket-integration.
Ọ̀nà àbáyọ tí a yàn
You can also toggle the involved prefs to false on the about:config page.
- security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha
- security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_256_sha
You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar. You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.
Ka ìdáhùn ni ìṣètò kíkà 👍 0All Replies (2)
hi thairis, mozilla cannot "solve" the logjam vulnerability since this is a vulnerability in the configuration of web-servers (that their respective owners, admins would have to fix). all a browser can do (and firefox 39 will do) is to disallow users from accessing insecure servers and displaying an error message instead. until then you can use this mozilla-provided addon: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/disable-dhe/
Ọ̀nà àbáyọ Tí a Yàn
You can also toggle the involved prefs to false on the about:config page.
- security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha
- security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_256_sha
You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar. You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.