Important Notice: We're experiencing email notification issues. If you've posted a question in the community forums recently, please check your profile manually for responses while we're working to fix this.

On Monday the 3rd of March, around 5pm UTC (9am PT) users may experience a brief period of downtime while one of our underlying services is under maintenance.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Èròjà atẹ̀lélànà yii ni a ti fi pamọ́ fọ́jọ́ pípẹ́. Jọ̀wọ́ béèrè ìbéèrè titun bí o bá nílò ìrànwọ́.

-webkit- vendor prefix css class is rendered

  • 1 èsì
  • 1 ní ìṣòro yìí
  • 11 views
  • Èsì tí ó kẹ́hìn lọ́wọ́ cor-el

more options

I have a special rule in my css to target a webkit webview on ios which has a layout rendering problem. This is a known issue. The only fix for this is adding this rule:

-webkit-transform: translate3d(0, 0, 0);

This gives some side effects in my apllication because the z-indexation is messed up. This was an acceptable trade-off when only webkit browsers are concerned.

Suddenly I see the side-effect occur in Firefox Quantum. It seems the css vendor-prefixed rule is also executed. I don't understand that. Isn't the browser supposed to only run it's own vendor prefixed classes? in this case the -moz- prefixed classes?

See the screenshot

Although only the `-webkit-transform` is defined is also shows the non-prefixed rule `transform:`

I have a special rule in my css to target a webkit webview on ios which has a layout rendering problem. This is a known issue. The only fix for this is adding this rule: -webkit-transform: translate3d(0, 0, 0); This gives some side effects in my apllication because the z-indexation is messed up. This was an acceptable trade-off when only webkit browsers are concerned. Suddenly I see the side-effect occur in Firefox Quantum. It seems the css vendor-prefixed rule is also executed. I don't understand that. Isn't the browser supposed to only run it's own vendor prefixed classes? in this case the -moz- prefixed classes? See the screenshot Although only the `-webkit-transform` is defined is also shows the non-prefixed rule `transform:`

Ọ̀nà àbáyọ tí a yàn

There is this pref to honor CSS rules with a -webkit prefix:

  • layout.css.prefixes.webkit

See also this old bug:

  • bug 725299 - Wrong z-ordering with css 3d transforms using opacity and transform-style

(please do not comment in bug reports
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html
)

Ka ìdáhùn ni ìṣètò kíkà 👍 0

All Replies (1)

more options

Ọ̀nà àbáyọ Tí a Yàn

There is this pref to honor CSS rules with a -webkit prefix:

  • layout.css.prefixes.webkit

See also this old bug:

  • bug 725299 - Wrong z-ordering with css 3d transforms using opacity and transform-style

(please do not comment in bug reports
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html
)