Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Èròjà atẹ̀lélànà yii ni a ti fi pamọ́ fọ́jọ́ pípẹ́. Jọ̀wọ́ béèrè ìbéèrè titun bí o bá nílò ìrànwọ́.

Mozilla Firefox Disables "Multirow Bookmark Toolbar" Customization (Userchrome.css) in Firefox 67 Beta 4

  • 2 àwọn èsì
  • 1 ní ìṣòro yìí
  • 23 views
  • Èsì tí ó kẹ́hìn lọ́wọ́ tempest21

more options

Mozilla? Major FAIL! The one thing that worked for me was the ability to customize a userchrome.css so that I could get the multirow toolbar to work through a customized "userchrome.css" file. CONGRATS (spoken with sarcasm) on releasing a new version of Firefox that completely ignores the userchrome.css file.

My current userchrome.css files looks like this:

/* Multi-Row Bookmarks Toolbar */

  1. PersonalToolbar {

/* Provide room for up to 4 rows at 26px */ max-height: 115px !important; }

  1. PlacesToolbarItems > box {

display: inline-block !important; }

  1. PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems {

/* Override hiding */ overflow-x: visible !important; overflow-y: visible !important; /* Add a little cushion */ padding-bottom: 1px; }

  1. PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems .bookmark-item {

/* Reduce padding on individual bookmarks to fit rows closer together */ padding-top: 1px !important; padding-bottom: 1px !important; } .tabbrowser-tab::before, .tabbrowser-tab::after{

 display: none !important;

} toolbarbutton.bookmark-item {

font-size:13px !important;

}

It no longer works as Firefox 67 completely ignores the file. If anyone has a suggestion, I'm all ears. Otherwise, I'll be dumping Firefox (after being a user for some 15+ years and switching to another web browser. Mozilla keeps removing vital functions of Firefox to make it less user friendly then it was before.

Mozilla? Major FAIL! The one thing that worked for me was the ability to customize a userchrome.css so that I could get the multirow toolbar to work through a customized "userchrome.css" file. CONGRATS (spoken with sarcasm) on releasing a new version of Firefox that completely ignores the userchrome.css file. My current userchrome.css files looks like this: /* Multi-Row Bookmarks Toolbar */ #PersonalToolbar { /* Provide room for up to 4 rows at 26px */ max-height: 115px !important; } #PlacesToolbarItems > box { display: inline-block !important; } #PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems { /* Override hiding */ overflow-x: visible !important; overflow-y: visible !important; /* Add a little cushion */ padding-bottom: 1px; } #PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems .bookmark-item { /* Reduce padding on individual bookmarks to fit rows closer together */ padding-top: 1px !important; padding-bottom: 1px !important; } .tabbrowser-tab::before, .tabbrowser-tab::after{ display: none !important; } toolbarbutton.bookmark-item { font-size:13px !important; } It no longer works as Firefox 67 completely ignores the file. If anyone has a suggestion, I'm all ears. Otherwise, I'll be dumping Firefox (after being a user for some 15+ years and switching to another web browser. Mozilla keeps removing vital functions of Firefox to make it less user friendly then it was before.

All Replies (2)

more options

This didn't affect you when you were using Firefox 66? There was a structural change to the bar and it's easy to find new style recipes now. For example:

https://www.reddit.com/r/FirefoxCSS/comments/b346fz/firefox_66_destroyed_my_more_toolbars_fix/

https://www.userchrome.org/what-is-userchrome-css.html#multirowbookmarks

more options

It really didn't when I upgraded to Firefox 66. Don't know why. But thanks for posting that link. It worked perfectly. There are certain links that I have in my toolbar and it's become an important feature of Firefox for me. Thanks for the reference link.