搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Don't loading extra big sprite images (width=57600px)

  • 3 回覆
  • 1 有這個問題
  • 6 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 cor-el

more options

I use extra big image as frame sequence for animation (sprite image). The image's width is 57600 px, height = 160px, weight = 1.85 mb. All modern browsers can load and show this image, but Firefox can't. FF also can't show the image by direct url to file.

image demo: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/imgtest.htm image source url: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/imgs/sphere3.jpg

Live demo complete project where used this images for animation: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/

FF Console says: "Syntax Error Image corrupt or truncated: ... Components is not defined"

also in FF javascript IMG .complete says "true" O_o

Please could anyone help me to fix it or explain why it's going so.

I use extra big image as frame sequence for animation (sprite image). The image's width is 57600 px, height = 160px, weight = 1.85 mb. All modern browsers can load and show this image, but Firefox can't. FF also can't show the image by direct url to file. image demo: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/imgtest.htm image source url: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/imgs/sphere3.jpg Live demo complete project where used this images for animation: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/ FF Console says: "Syntax Error Image corrupt or truncated: ... Components is not defined" also in FF javascript IMG .complete says "true" O_o Please could anyone help me to fix it or explain why it's going so.

所有回覆 (3)

more options

On Windows, Firefox 4 and later traditionally has failed on images larger than 32,766 pixels in any direction. You're not the first person to find this annoying: https://support.mozilla.org/search?a=1&w=2&q=32,766.

I'm not sure when this might get fixed...

more options

Ow, got it. Thank you for your kind reply.

Hope it will be fixed in future FF updates...

more options

I'm not sure if it is that issue. On Linux this would normally work, but it shows a white image. Interesting is that Firefox 3.6 shows the first part of the image, but with wrong colors.

Maybe it is worth to file a bug about this issue.