搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Can I prevent Firefox from resizing the date selection control on data entry webpages?

  • 1 回覆
  • 1 有這個問題
  • 3 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 TyDraniu

more options

Using an online accounting website, data entry is done through a data grid with a data control.

The accounting software allows for the option to use their own date selection control or to use the Firefox date selection control. I don't like the software's date selection control, I prefer Firefox's. However, when set to the Firefox date selection control AND if the fields in the data entry grid get wider than the screen, Firefox shrinks the date selection control to practically nothingness and the value in the control cannot be seen.

Is there something I can do stop Firefox from doing this?

I've attached an image containing 1. the data entry grid 2. the Firefox date selection control when the data entry grid is wider than the screen 3. the software date selection control when the data entry grid is wider than the screen

Using an online accounting website, data entry is done through a data grid with a data control. The accounting software allows for the option to use their own date selection control or to use the Firefox date selection control. I don't like the software's date selection control, I prefer Firefox's. However, when set to the Firefox date selection control AND if the fields in the data entry grid get wider than the screen, Firefox shrinks the date selection control to practically nothingness and the value in the control cannot be seen. Is there something I can do stop Firefox from doing this? I've attached an image containing 1. the data entry grid 2. the Firefox date selection control when the data entry grid is wider than the screen 3. the software date selection control when the data entry grid is wider than the screen
附加的畫面擷圖

由 Joshua Jacobs 於 修改

被選擇的解決方法

Right, it is our bug. You have to wait to version 87 for a fix.

從原來的回覆中察看解決方案 👍 1

所有回覆 (1)

more options

選擇的解決方法

Right, it is our bug. You have to wait to version 87 for a fix.