Hilfe durchsuchen

Vorsicht vor Support-Betrug: Wir fordern Sie niemals auf, eine Telefonnummer anzurufen, eine SMS an eine Telefonnummer zu senden oder persönliche Daten preiszugeben. Bitte melden Sie verdächtige Aktivitäten über die Funktion „Missbrauch melden“.

Weitere Informationen

How to Change the Default "Outbox" from Local Folders to my Default Account?

  • 3 Antworten
  • 1 hat dieses Problem
  • 3 Aufrufe
  • Letzte Antwort von Matt

more options

For a long time my default account used the "Special" Local Folders account for incoming and outgoing mail. (This was because when I created the account in TBird, in server settings for POP3, there was no option for using "default account:Sent" etc. in the Account Settings, Copies & Folders pane. Now that I (finally) figured out how to get TBird to create the default "Sent" and "Outbox" for the account, and to target them for "normal operation" I cannot get it to use an account-based "Outbox" for send-later mail. Instead it always puts the mail in the Local Folders:Outbox. I even tried changing the config editor entry:

mail.default_sendlater_uri mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Unsent%20Messages

to my local account like:

mail.default_sendlater_uri mailbox://nobody@My%AcccountName/Unsent%20Messages

which changed nothing - send later messages still went to Local Folders:Outbox.

Is there a way to get "Send Later" to drop the mail into "My AccountName:Outbox?

For a long time my default account used the "Special" Local Folders account for incoming and outgoing mail. (This was because when I created the account in TBird, in server settings for POP3, there was no option for using "default account:Sent" etc. in the Account Settings, Copies & Folders pane. Now that I (finally) figured out how to get TBird to create the default "Sent" and "Outbox" for the account, and to target them for "normal operation" I cannot get it to use an account-based "Outbox" for send-later mail. Instead it always puts the mail in the Local Folders:Outbox. I even tried changing the config editor entry: mail.default_sendlater_uri mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Unsent%20Messages to my local account like: mail.default_sendlater_uri mailbox://nobody@My%AcccountName/Unsent%20Messages which changed nothing - send later messages still went to Local Folders:Outbox. Is there a way to get "Send Later" to drop the mail into "My AccountName:Outbox?

Alle Antworten (3)

more options

wmcole said

For a long time my default account used the "Special" Local Folders account for incoming and outgoing mail. (This was because when I created the account in TBird, in server settings for POP3, there was no option for using "default account:Sent" etc. in the Account Settings, Copies & Folders pane. Now that I (finally) figured out how to get TBird to create the default "Sent" and "Outbox" for the account, and to target them for "normal operation" I cannot get it to use an account-based "Outbox" for send-later mail. Instead it always puts the mail in the Local Folders:Outbox. I even tried changing the config editor entry: mail.default_sendlater_uri mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Unsent%20Messages to my local account like: mail.default_sendlater_uri mailbox://nobody@My%AcccountName/Unsent%20Messages which changed nothing - send later messages still went to Local Folders:Outbox. Is there a way to get "Send Later" to drop the mail into "My AccountName:Outbox?

Send later is in Local folders. That is not an accident or some sort of strange oddity it is a decision that was made probably 20 years ago in the development team at Netscape.

more options

I get why that decision was made, but I would still like account-based Outboxes like I have account-based Inboxes.

more options

wmcole said

I get why that decision was made, but I would still like account-based Outboxes like I have account-based Inboxes.

And you can not have them. I actually think it would be a major development process to even implement. I am no developer, but I think it would take a dedicated developers several weeks to implement. So I guess we would be talking close to a hundred thousand dollars worth of development, testing and approvals. Not something I would support given there is no functional improvement. Cosmetic change not withstanding.