Join the Mozilla’s Test Days event from 9–15 Jan to test the new Firefox address bar on Firefox Beta 135 and get a chance to win Mozilla swag vouchers! 🎁

Hilfe durchsuchen

Vorsicht vor Support-Betrug: Wir fordern Sie niemals auf, eine Telefonnummer anzurufen, eine SMS an eine Telefonnummer zu senden oder persönliche Daten preiszugeben. Bitte melden Sie verdächtige Aktivitäten über die Funktion „Missbrauch melden“.

Weitere Informationen

Why does Firefox block secure sites that are trusted by a sub-ca cert if the site uses a non-standard port that isn't included in the SANs?

  • 3 Antworten
  • 1 hat dieses Problem
  • 10 Aufrufe
  • Letzte Antwort von John

more options

Navigating to an HTTPS site (ex. https://consul.service.consul) works fine with my imported sub-ca cert as it includes consul.service.consul as a SAN. If I change the port the site is served from to something non-standard however, the site comes back as not trusted (ex. https://consul.service.consul:8501). Is this expected behavior to have to include port numbers in a SAN listing for certificates, or is this a bug potentially?

Navigating to an HTTPS site (ex. https://consul.service.consul) works fine with my imported sub-ca cert as it includes consul.service.consul as a SAN. If I change the port the site is served from to something non-standard however, the site comes back as not trusted (ex. https://consul.service.consul:8501). Is this expected behavior to have to include port numbers in a SAN listing for certificates, or is this a bug potentially?
Angefügte Screenshots

Ausgewählte Lösung

It appears that this issue was resolved in the latest releases. Not sure what was done, but I'm glad it's fixed never-the-less. Thanks for the responses all!

Diese Antwort im Kontext lesen 👍 0

Alle Antworten (3)

more options

sometimes your add on preventing that with a pop up , or else check your FF settings if they are at default!!

it could be even something wrong with the site as well,

more options

I'm finding this question hard to research. I think that means it is supposed to work. If you want to file a bug:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/

more options

Ausgewählte Lösung

It appears that this issue was resolved in the latest releases. Not sure what was done, but I'm glad it's fixed never-the-less. Thanks for the responses all!