Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

I want to register a custom protocol handler in Firefox/Linux

  • 2 ŋuɖoɖowo
  • 13 masɔmasɔ sia le wosi
  • 1 view
  • Nuɖoɖo mlɔetɔ stefanreich

more options

Hi,

I am trying the usual methods to register a protocol handler for my local application. Meaning, I created these values in about:config:

network.protocol-handler.app.javax = /home/stefan/bin/j network.protocol-handler.expose.javax = false network.protocol-handler.external.javax = true

However, when I type "javax:test" in the URL bar, it sends me to Google.

Hi, I am trying the usual methods to register a protocol handler for my local application. Meaning, I created these values in about:config: network.protocol-handler.app.javax = /home/stefan/bin/j network.protocol-handler.expose.javax = false network.protocol-handler.external.javax = true However, when I type "javax:test" in the URL bar, it sends me to Google.

Ŋuɖoɖo si wotia

When you would create only network.protocol-handler.expose.javax = false then Firefox should prompt for the application to handle this protocol and add this protocol to mimeTypes.rdf. Testing/forcing this javax protocol via the location/address bar wouldn't work.

This works for me to force a dialog to select the application:

Xle ŋuɖoɖo sia le goya me 👍 2

All Replies (2)

more options

Ɖɔɖɔɖo si wotia

When you would create only network.protocol-handler.expose.javax = false then Firefox should prompt for the application to handle this protocol and add this protocol to mimeTypes.rdf. Testing/forcing this javax protocol via the location/address bar wouldn't work.

This works for me to force a dialog to select the application:

more options

Yesss!! I see now, it doesn't work in the address line (why not?). With a link, all fine. Thanks!