Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Not all info is seen pn a page

more options

We have page http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/spreadsheetsForum.nsf/AllByUNID/37D031F1FCD781FE85257A1C0047638C?open&forum=Questions%20and%20Troubleshooting&row=1

If we open it in Chrome 19.0.1084.56 m, then we see all info in topic

"IBM Lotus Symphony 3 RU on Russian Windows XP Professional SP3 (32bit) We have MS Office 2007 SP3 excel file. Cell A1 contains formula (=(20-2+1)+(31-22+1)+(40-33+1)+1+2+(53-49+1)+2+4+2+1+2+3+3+2+1+1+3+2+1+2+2+2+2+3+1+4+(135-131+1)+2+1+1+(153-147+1)+1+1+2+3+(172-169+1)+1+1+1+1+3+1+(198-194+1)+2+1+1+3+2+2+2+1+(232-225+1)+3+2+2+3+3+1+1+(270-261+1)+(275-272+1)+(282-277+1)+3+2+(308-292+1)+4+1+1+(325-320+1)+4+1+2+1+1+1+(359-355+1)+2+2+2+(376-371+1)+3+2+1+(392-387+1)+1+2+1+1+1+2+2+4+2+1+2+(437-433+1)+1+1+(450-446+1)+1+5+1+5+1+1+2+1+3+(492-486+1)+4+1+(506-501+1)+(513-509+1)+1+1+1+(531-524+1)+1+1+2+1+3+2+1+1+1+2+(577-571+1)+3+4+5+2+1+1+1+1+1+1+3+3+2+1+4+1+1+1+2+2+2+1+3+2+1+1+1+2+1+3+3+3+2+3+2+2+2+6+1+4+3+2+8+3+2+15+1+6+1+3+4+3+4+4+4+2+7+8+1+5) and we have total amount = 536If we try to open that file in Symphony 3, then we see that cell A1 contains ANOTHER formula, which is truncated =(20-2+1)+(31-22+1)+(40-33+1)+1+2+(53-49+1)+2+4+2+1+2+3+3+2+1+1+3+2+1+2+2+2+2+3+1+4+(135-131+1)+2+1+1+(153-147+1)+1+1+2+3+(172-169+1)+1+1+1+1+3+1+(198-194+1)+2+1+1+3+2+2+2+1+(232-225+1)+3+2+2+3+3+1+1+(270-261+1)+(275-272+1)+(282-277+1)+3+2+(308-292+1)+4+1+1+(325-320+1)+4+1+2+1+1+1+(359-355+1)+2+2+2+(376-371+1)+3+2+1+(392-387+1)+1+2+1+1+1+2+2+4+2+1+2+(437-433+1)+1+1+(450-446+1)+1+5+1+5+1+1+2+1+3+(492-486+1)+4+1+(506-501+1)+(513-509+1)+1+1+1+(531-524+1)+1+1+2+1+3+2+1+1+1+2+(577-571+1)+3+4+5+2+1+1+1+1+1+1+3+3+2+1+4+1+1+1+2+2+2+1+3+2+1+1+1+2+1+3+3+3+2+3+2+2+2+6+1+4+3+2+8+3+2+15+1+6+1+3+4+3+4+4+4+2) and we have total amount = 515Last operators (+7+8+1+5) which were in MS Office, in Symphony mysteriously disappeared from formula and total amount changed. Symphony does not show any messages.If we try to add missing operators in Symphony (not even all, only one) in formula, then we immediately get "error 512".Exactly the same problem exists in Apache Open Office 3.4.0 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119451 and Libreoffice 3.5.4 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50419 If we perform the same actions in Microsoft Office 2007 SP3 then all is fine (we even can add a few more operators, and all will be fine).I'd like to attach sample files here, but can't do it. You can see example files in Bugzilla for corresponding products."

If we try to open this page in FF 13 then we see only first two lines

"IBM Lotus Symphony 3 RU on Russian Windows XP Professional SP3 (32bit) We have MS Office 2007 SP3 excel file. Cell A1 contains formula (=(20-2+1)+(31-22+1)+(40-33+1)+1+2+(53-49+1)+2+4+2+1+"

and all the other info is truncated.

The same problem is with Opera 12

We have page http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/spreadsheetsForum.nsf/AllByUNID/37D031F1FCD781FE85257A1C0047638C?open&forum=Questions%20and%20Troubleshooting&row=1 If we open it in Chrome 19.0.1084.56 m, then we see all info in topic "IBM Lotus Symphony 3 RU on Russian Windows XP Professional SP3 (32bit) We have MS Office 2007 SP3 excel file. Cell A1 contains formula (=(20-2+1)+(31-22+1)+(40-33+1)+1+2+(53-49+1)+2+4+2+1+2+3+3+2+1+1+3+2+1+2+2+2+2+3+1+4+(135-131+1)+2+1+1+(153-147+1)+1+1+2+3+(172-169+1)+1+1+1+1+3+1+(198-194+1)+2+1+1+3+2+2+2+1+(232-225+1)+3+2+2+3+3+1+1+(270-261+1)+(275-272+1)+(282-277+1)+3+2+(308-292+1)+4+1+1+(325-320+1)+4+1+2+1+1+1+(359-355+1)+2+2+2+(376-371+1)+3+2+1+(392-387+1)+1+2+1+1+1+2+2+4+2+1+2+(437-433+1)+1+1+(450-446+1)+1+5+1+5+1+1+2+1+3+(492-486+1)+4+1+(506-501+1)+(513-509+1)+1+1+1+(531-524+1)+1+1+2+1+3+2+1+1+1+2+(577-571+1)+3+4+5+2+1+1+1+1+1+1+3+3+2+1+4+1+1+1+2+2+2+1+3+2+1+1+1+2+1+3+3+3+2+3+2+2+2+6+1+4+3+2+8+3+2+15+1+6+1+3+4+3+4+4+4+2+7+8+1+5) and we have total amount = 536If we try to open that file in Symphony 3, then we see that cell A1 contains ANOTHER formula, which is truncated =(20-2+1)+(31-22+1)+(40-33+1)+1+2+(53-49+1)+2+4+2+1+2+3+3+2+1+1+3+2+1+2+2+2+2+3+1+4+(135-131+1)+2+1+1+(153-147+1)+1+1+2+3+(172-169+1)+1+1+1+1+3+1+(198-194+1)+2+1+1+3+2+2+2+1+(232-225+1)+3+2+2+3+3+1+1+(270-261+1)+(275-272+1)+(282-277+1)+3+2+(308-292+1)+4+1+1+(325-320+1)+4+1+2+1+1+1+(359-355+1)+2+2+2+(376-371+1)+3+2+1+(392-387+1)+1+2+1+1+1+2+2+4+2+1+2+(437-433+1)+1+1+(450-446+1)+1+5+1+5+1+1+2+1+3+(492-486+1)+4+1+(506-501+1)+(513-509+1)+1+1+1+(531-524+1)+1+1+2+1+3+2+1+1+1+2+(577-571+1)+3+4+5+2+1+1+1+1+1+1+3+3+2+1+4+1+1+1+2+2+2+1+3+2+1+1+1+2+1+3+3+3+2+3+2+2+2+6+1+4+3+2+8+3+2+15+1+6+1+3+4+3+4+4+4+2) and we have total amount = 515Last operators (+7+8+1+5) which were in MS Office, in Symphony mysteriously disappeared from formula and total amount changed. Symphony does not show any messages.If we try to add missing operators in Symphony (not even all, only one) in formula, then we immediately get "error 512".Exactly the same problem exists in Apache Open Office 3.4.0 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119451 and Libreoffice 3.5.4 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50419 If we perform the same actions in Microsoft Office 2007 SP3 then all is fine (we even can add a few more operators, and all will be fine).I'd like to attach sample files here, but can't do it. You can see example files in Bugzilla for corresponding products." If we try to open this page in FF 13 then we see only first two lines "IBM Lotus Symphony 3 RU on Russian Windows XP Professional SP3 (32bit) We have MS Office 2007 SP3 excel file. Cell A1 contains formula (=(20-2+1)+(31-22+1)+(40-33+1)+1+2+(53-49+1)+2+4+2+1+" and all the other info is truncated. The same problem is with Opera 12

Chosen solution

That is caused by a missing white-space:pre-wrap; CSS rule.

Add code to the userContent.css file in the chrome folder

The customization files userChrome.css (interface) and userContent.css (websites) are located in the chrome folder in the user profile folder.


@-moz-document domain(www-03.ibm.com){ 
 pre{ white-space: pre-wrap !important; }
}
Read this answer in context 👍 1

All Replies (7)

more options

Chosen Solution

That is caused by a missing white-space:pre-wrap; CSS rule.

Add code to the userContent.css file in the chrome folder

The customization files userChrome.css (interface) and userContent.css (websites) are located in the chrome folder in the user profile folder.


@-moz-document domain(www-03.ibm.com){ 
 pre{ white-space: pre-wrap !important; }
}
more options

Your answer helped me, but it is a temporary solution. I hope browser update would be released soon.

more options

Firefox uses white-space: pre !important; by default and doesn't wrap long lines and this won't change via an update update. You need to use the correct CSS rules to make Firefox display the code properly.

  • line 264: resource://gre-resources/html.css
xmp, pre, plaintext {
  display: block;
  font-family: -moz-fixed;
  white-space: pre;
  margin: 1em 0;
}
more options

Your answer helped me, but it is a temporary solution. I hope browser update would be released soon.

The post used a <pre> tag for that text. So it is displaying as specified. The problem is, it was a bad idea to use a <pre> tag in that post. But probably in most situations where someone uses a <pre> tag you would want the classic monospaced display. So it's hard to change Firefox to make exceptions in just the right cases.

more options

I have not used a pre tag for that text. It was made without my participation. I simply pasted text with problem description and posted it.

Modified by Timon

more options

PRE means pre-formatted text and you add the line breaks yourself.
PRE is usually used to display tables where the columns are separated by multiple spaces that you do not want to wrap.

So in your case you either have to wrap the long text (white-space: pre-wrap) or add a scroll bar (overflow-x: scroll) to make it possible to see all the text.

more options

I looked at the next 10 threads on that board, and none of them have the <pre> tag. I think it could have come from whatever program/editor you used to compose the description.