【Feature Request】Consider adding "SM4”
For more: SM2 by ISO SM2 by ISO.
Advantages in brief:
1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits).
2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC.
3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other.
4. Free to the public.
5. Safe in use.
For more: [https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cuiling-dnsop-sm2-alg-14.html SM2 by ISO] SM2 by ISO.
Advantages in brief:
1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits).
2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC.
3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other.
4. Free to the public.
5. Safe in use.
すべての返信 (1)
Where to change the topic? In fact, SM2/3/4/9 are passed by ISO and the other related orgs.
投稿に返信するには あなたのアカウントにログイン する必要があります。まだアカウントをお持ちでなければ、新しい質問を開始 してください。