Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Consistently getting "Login to server imap.googlemail.com failed.",

  • 4 replies
  • 6 have this problem
  • 8 views
  • Last reply by Zenos

more options

I am consistently getting "Login to server imap.googlemail.com failed.", on one Gmail account even though settings are identical to other gmail accounts that work perfectly.

Would be grateful for a solution.

I am consistently getting "Login to server imap.googlemail.com failed.", on one Gmail account even though settings are identical to other gmail accounts that work perfectly. Would be grateful for a solution.

All Replies (4)

more options

You may have to enable less secure apps in your Google account settings. https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6009563?hl=en

more options

DocVogue said

I am consistently getting "Login to server imap.googlemail.com failed.", on one Gmail account even though settings are identical to other gmail accounts that work perfectly. Would be grateful for a solution.

As I thought I was in a Thunderbird forum for Mozilla, I wasn't as specific as I needed to be. The "Login to server imap.googlemail.com failed." error comes up when using Thunderbird and trying to access a Gmail account. There are no "apps" involved.

more options

I'd suggest you make the effort and read the Google support article linked above.

more options

Hmm, as far as Gmail is concerned, Thunderbird is a "less secure app(lication)" and requires the user to specifically permit it to be used.

It appears to be Google's choice to call everything an "app". https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6010255?hl=en

Indeed you need to read a tad more carefully.

I see devs talking about OAuth2, which when introduced should make this option redundant.

Modified by Zenos