Important Notice: We're experiencing email notification issues. If you've posted a question in the community forums recently, please check your profile manually for responses while we're working to fix this.

On Monday the 3rd of March, around 5pm UTC (9am PT) users may experience a brief period of downtime while one of our underlying services is under maintenance.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

What is the expected navigation behavior of a 204 response to a form post.

  • 1 reply
  • 0 have this problem
  • 5 views
  • Last reply by grimzecho

more options

According to Mozilla, the 204 No Content response "indicates that a request has succeeded but that the client doesn't need to navigate away from its current page".

However, when Firefox receives such a code in response to a status code, it triggers the `window.onbeforeunload` event and any associated handlers. This has side-effects such as closing any open websocket connections associated with the page, re-rendering the DOM (which fires various lifecycle methods in single page apps), and other similar activities that are generally associated with navigating away from a page.

Is this behavior intended or documented anywhere? Or should it be considered a bug?

According to Mozilla, the [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/204 204 No Content] response "indicates that a request has succeeded but that the client doesn't need to navigate away from its current page". However, when Firefox receives such a code in response to a status code, it triggers the `window.onbeforeunload` event and any associated handlers. This has side-effects such as closing any open websocket connections associated with the page, re-rendering the DOM (which fires various lifecycle methods in single page apps), and other similar activities that are generally associated with navigating away from a page. Is this behavior intended or documented anywhere? Or should it be considered a bug?

All Replies (1)

more options

--edit-- There is a typo. The first sentence of the second paragraph should read: "However, when Firefox receives such a code in response to a form post, it triggers ..."