Avatar for Username

Caută ajutor

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Află mai multe

Acest fir de discuție a fost arhivat. Adresează o întrebare nouă dacă ai nevoie de ajutor.

In-message anchors are forced to open in a web browser

  • 3 răspunsuri
  • 3 au această problemă
  • 1 vizualizare
  • Ultimul răspuns de SadFirefoxUser

jfowlie
jfowlie
more options

In Thunderbird 31, when I click on a link in a message that points to an anchor within the same message (e.g. imap://account@mail.server.net:143/fetch%3EUID%3E.INBOX%3E55326#1) it pops open a Firefox window to open the message instead of scrolling through the message pane to the anchor. This used to work properly in previous versions.

Am I missing a setting somewhere, is it a bug, or is it the new normal?

Thanks, --James

In Thunderbird 31, when I click on a link in a message that points to an anchor within the same message (e.g. imap://account@mail.server.net:143/fetch%3EUID%3E.INBOX%3E55326#1) it pops open a Firefox window to open the message instead of scrolling through the message pane to the anchor. This used to work properly in previous versions. Am I missing a setting somewhere, is it a bug, or is it the new normal? Thanks, --James

Soluție aleasă

This is probably Bug 974857 - Anchor links not working when reading HTML e-mails (involving IMAP)

Citește acest răspuns în context 👍 0

Toate răspunsurile (3)

Onno Ekker
Onno Ekker
more options

Soluție aleasă

This is probably Bug 974857 - Anchor links not working when reading HTML e-mails (involving IMAP)

jfowlie
jfowlie Deținătorul întrebării
more options

That's it exactly!

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

--James

SadFirefoxUser
SadFirefoxUser
more options

Sorry, but I did not understand the solution, or if there even is a solution! Did I miss something or is this still a bug awaiting a future solution? The forum entry speaks of 'chosen solution'--very confusing...