Caută ajutor

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Află mai multe

Acest fir de discuție a fost arhivat. Adresează o întrebare nouă dacă ai nevoie de ajutor.

I need to reinstall a hoverlink addon to read articles - don't remember its name - help

  • 3 răspunsuri
  • 1 are această problemă
  • 1 vizualizare
  • Ultimul răspuns de McCoy

more options

I had to refresh Firefox & lost the link that let me read articles by hovering over the link. Fon't remember its name. Someone on the forum told me in the first place. Also my image expander the gave me a larger image when I hover over it is one I'd like to find again.

This is for a desktop with windows 10.

I had to refresh Firefox & lost the link that let me read articles by hovering over the link. Fon't remember its name. Someone on the forum told me in the first place. Also my image expander the gave me a larger image when I hover over it is one I'd like to find again. This is for a desktop with windows 10.

Soluție aleasă

Hello jPendragon,

Could it be that you are talking about the add-on I suggested to you in this thread :

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1226304  ?

Citește acest răspuns în context 👍 1

Toate răspunsurile (3)

more options

Soluție aleasă

Hello jPendragon,

Could it be that you are talking about the add-on I suggested to you in this thread :

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1226304  ?

more options

Thanks! That was it. Could you guide me to the addon that makes images larger when I hover over them? You're the kind of good Samaritan that makes Firefox the civil community it was meant to be.

more options

jPendragon said

Could you guide me to the addon that makes images larger when I hover over them?

'Found these add-ons :

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/imagus/

And :

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/hoverzoom-plus/

Will they do what you are looking for, or does it not even come close  ?

(keeping my fingers crossed ..... )