Шукати в статтях підтримки

Остерігайтеся нападів зловмисників. Mozilla ніколи не просить вас зателефонувати, надіслати номер телефону у повідомленні або поділитися з кимось особистими даними. Будь ласка, повідомте про підозрілі дії за допомогою меню “Повідомити про зловживання”

Докладніше

Ця тема перенесена в архів. Якщо вам потрібна допомога, запитайте.

Still stuck on Firefox 8.0 on release channel Dec. 11, 2011

  • 7 відповідей
  • 20 мають цю проблему
  • 1 перегляд
  • Остання відповідь від Rick314

more options

Still stuck on Firefox 8.0 on release channel Dec. 11, 2011; I thought 8.01 was released Nov. 28, 2011. Any ideas why I'd still be one 8.0 when several of my systems updated as they should (the end of November)? Could the old built in video (VIA/S3G UniChrome IGP) stop it from updating? The Video does show errors in the Troubleshooting Information.

Still stuck on Firefox 8.0 on release channel Dec. 11, 2011; I thought 8.01 was released Nov. 28, 2011. Any ideas why I'd still be one 8.0 when several of my systems updated as they should (the end of November)? Could the old built in video (VIA/S3G UniChrome IGP) stop it from updating? The Video does show errors in the Troubleshooting Information.

Обране рішення

Still doesn't explain why some systems updated and others didn't...

If they were Windows systems then they likely had a version between 4.0 and 7.0.1

The Firefox 8.0 to 8.0.1 patch has only been served to Mac users.

Читати цю відповідь у контексті 👍 0

Усі відповіді (7)

more options

Mozilla doesn't offer the update to Firefox 8.0.1 to user on Windows.
That (automatic) update is only offered to users on Mac because it doesn't make a change to users on Windows and Linux.

You can find the latest Firefox release here if you want the 8.0.1 version:

more options

A moderator posted that Mac get upgraded to 8.0.1, and 3,6.24 gets optionally updated to 8.0.1, but for Windows there was no real benefit so we will go directly to 9.0 from 8.0 Anybody starting new now gets 8.0.1 since near end of Nov.

I don't know about optionally because every time I restored my 3.6.* system it ends up on 8.0 when restated so obviously my profiles have been damaged.

more options

The only benefit for Windows users to have 8.0.1 is if they have a older version of Roboform or to try if they are getting crashes upon Firefox startup. Even though Linux users have no need for 8.0.1 at all it was just easier to provided it anyways much like they did with Firefox 5.0.1 when that was only for Mac OSX 10.5 and 10.7 users in mind.

Windows, Mac and Linux users using older Firefox 4.0 to 7.0.1 releases from Mozilla will get the update to 8.0.1 if user checks for updates.

more options

Still doesn't explain why some systems updated and others didn't. I will also note that .zip files aren't downloading properly under 8.0 but works under 8.01 which is what made me spot the difference. So what seems to be stated is to get working .zip downloads I need to manually update right?

more options

Вибране рішення

Still doesn't explain why some systems updated and others didn't...

If they were Windows systems then they likely had a version between 4.0 and 7.0.1

The Firefox 8.0 to 8.0.1 patch has only been served to Mac users.

more options

While this is a poor solution, I guess it's what Mozilla has done! My Firefox 8.0 XP Pro systems don't download .zip files correctly and I have been forced to use WGET to do downloading of zips because of this. It's a poor excuse to say 8.01 doesn't help much when it fixes this problem! I guess I'm forced to manually update the systems that are still stuck at 8.0 so I can use zip files again! Bad move on Mozilla's part.

more options

> The Firefox 8.0 to 8.0.1 patch has only been served to Mac users.

I have a circa-2004 Dell D600 laptop running Windows XP Pro SP3 and it got updated to 8.0.1, while my circa-2004 Dell 8300 desktop running Windows XP Home SP3 did not. I am fairly sure both were at 8.0 before, and I did nothing intentionally to change either.

IMHO each release should go to *all* operating systems, whether it supposedly impacts them or not. Otherwise, it makes all users (like those in this thread) have to take the time to figure out *why* some machines have updated and some haven't -- an apparent defect, that if you learn enough and waste enough time, isn't apparently a defect. Would anyone be offended if an update to the latest release happened and it didn't change anything on their OS? (Particularly for those that like details, documentation just said nothing changed on specific OSs.)