Important Notice: We're experiencing email notification issues. If you've posted a question in the community forums recently, please check your profile manually for responses while we're working to fix this.

On Monday the 3rd of March, around 5pm UTC (9am PT) users may experience a brief period of downtime while one of our underlying services is under maintenance.

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Do I need to add separate cookie exceptions for HTTP and HTTPS?

  • 2 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 6 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 P1h3r1e3d13

more options

In the “Exceptions - Cookies and Site Data” dialog (Options > Privacy & Security > Cookies and Site Data > Exceptions), entering a domain as “foo.example.com” creates an entry for “http://foo.example.com”. Explicitly entering “https://foo.example.com” creates an entry for “https://foo.example.com”.

I don't really know how cookies work with HTTP/S. Is it useful to have an entry for each protocol? Or does the “http://...” entry cover both already? If both are necessary, is there a way to add and remove them together, automatically? It seems like a pretty unlikely case to want different rules per protocol.

In the “Exceptions - Cookies and Site Data” dialog (Options > Privacy & Security > Cookies and Site Data > Exceptions), entering a domain as “foo.example.com” creates an entry for “http://foo.example.com”. Explicitly entering “https://foo.example.com” creates an entry for “https://foo.example.com”. I don't really know how cookies work with HTTP/S. Is it useful to have an entry for each protocol? Or does the “http://...” entry cover both already? If both are necessary, is there a way to add and remove them together, automatically? It seems like a pretty unlikely case to want different rules per protocol.

被采纳的解决方案

Well, the exception needs to match the site. In some cases, a site may support both HTTP and HTTPS access. In that case, you need to add both.

For many years, Firefox did not care what protocol was used with a site, the permissions would apply regardless. However, at some point it was decided that perhaps you might only want to grant permission for something when the site was using a secure connection, so now the protocol is required.

(I use the more general term permissions because the same approach applies to location/GPS access, microphone/camera access, and ability to set cookies, among others.)

Perhaps you can find an add-on which makes it easier to add both at once?

定位到答案原位置 👍 1

所有回复 (2)

more options

选择的解决方案

Well, the exception needs to match the site. In some cases, a site may support both HTTP and HTTPS access. In that case, you need to add both.

For many years, Firefox did not care what protocol was used with a site, the permissions would apply regardless. However, at some point it was decided that perhaps you might only want to grant permission for something when the site was using a secure connection, so now the protocol is required.

(I use the more general term permissions because the same approach applies to location/GPS access, microphone/camera access, and ability to set cookies, among others.)

Perhaps you can find an add-on which makes it easier to add both at once?

more options

Thanks, that clears it up.

Hmm, maybe this is a candidate for for a UI bug. Checkboxes or something for “HTTP/HTTPS/both” would help a lot and make sense in modern usage.