搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Firefox ESR 78.7.0 error - "Failed to read the configuration file"

  • 5 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 70 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 drepollet

more options

We currently have a setup where we're installing Firefox ESR 68.10.0 using a .CFG and .JS file for custom configurations. Everything has been working great, but now we have a need to update to the latest version of Firefox ESR due to recently-announced security vulnerabilities. I am testing the upgrade to 78.7.0 using the same .CFG and .JS files, and I get the error "Failed to read the configuration file. Please contact your system administrator." at startup. I tried doing a complete uninstall of the old version and install of the new one, keeping the same config files, but the same error comes up. The support documentation for ESR 78.7.0 makes no indication that these configuration files are to be used, instead mentioning that Group Policies should be used for configuration in a Windows environment. But we have various user groups that require specialized configurations, and using the configuration files has worked best for us. Is there any way to keep using the configuration files? If so, what changes would I need to make to the formatting of the files to get them working? Any help is greatly appreciated!

We currently have a setup where we're installing Firefox ESR 68.10.0 using a .CFG and .JS file for custom configurations. Everything has been working great, but now we have a need to update to the latest version of Firefox ESR due to recently-announced security vulnerabilities. I am testing the upgrade to 78.7.0 using the same .CFG and .JS files, and I get the error "Failed to read the configuration file. Please contact your system administrator." at startup. I tried doing a complete uninstall of the old version and install of the new one, keeping the same config files, but the same error comes up. The support documentation for ESR 78.7.0 makes no indication that these configuration files are to be used, instead mentioning that Group Policies should be used for configuration in a Windows environment. But we have various user groups that require specialized configurations, and using the configuration files has worked best for us. Is there any way to keep using the configuration files? If so, what changes would I need to make to the formatting of the files to get them working? Any help is greatly appreciated!

被采纳的解决方案

You need to convert your use of Services.perms.add to Services.perms.addFromPrinicipal. The syntax is close, just changes the way the URL is created

     Services.perms.addFromPrincipal(
       Services.scriptSecurityManager.createContentPrincipalFromOrigin("https://URL"),
       "popup",
       1);
定位到答案原位置 👍 1

所有回复 (5)

more options

This is about using an autoconfig.cfg file to deploy Firefox and there is a problem with this file, either missing or has invalid JavaScript. You can check the Browser Console on startup for related messages.

Note that GPO prevails and autoconfig and policies might not work.

I will move the question to Firefox for enterprise.

more options

My guess is some API changed and it's not working in 78. Should be easy to fix.

Can you check the JS console after startup and look for errors that reference your config file?

Ctrl+Shift+J

Or if you're willing to send me your autoconfig file, I can take a look

mkaply at mozilla.com

more options

Mike Kaply said

My guess is some API changed and it's not working in 78. Should be easy to fix. Can you check the JS console after startup and look for errors that reference your config file? Ctrl+Shift+J Or if you're willing to send me your autoconfig file, I can take a look mkaply at mozilla.com

Thanks for your help. I was able to find an error related to a function in our custom CFG file. I've included a screenshot of the error as well as the function in the CFG file. The "var" declaration and "Services.perms.add" function are used several times for other URLs in the file.

Let me know if there is anything else I can provide to aid with troubleshooting this. Thanks!

more options

选择的解决方案

You need to convert your use of Services.perms.add to Services.perms.addFromPrinicipal. The syntax is close, just changes the way the URL is created

     Services.perms.addFromPrincipal(
       Services.scriptSecurityManager.createContentPrincipalFromOrigin("https://URL"),
       "popup",
       1);
more options

Mike Kaply said

You need to convert your use of Services.perms.add to Services.perms.addFromPrinicipal. The syntax is close, just changes the way the URL is created Services.perms.addFromPrincipal( Services.scriptSecurityManager.createContentPrincipalFromOrigin("https://URL"), "popup", 1);

Thank you Mike, this worked great!