搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

TB not sorting messages correctly!!

  • 1 个回答
  • 2 人有此问题
  • 1 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 rearlclay1

more options

I've used TB for many, many years and have never seen this before. TB is not correctly sorting the emails in my Sent box by date. The problem seems to be only in the Sent folder and only with the sort on Date --- sorting on the other columns seems to be OK. And the problem is not with a lot of the emails --- only an occasional email here and there which is not in date order. The problem occurs if I sort in ascending Date order and when I sort in descending Date order. I tried executing the Repair Folder command (in Folder Properties) but that has not fixed the problem. I'm using TB 102.2.2 (64 bit) on a Linux OS.

I've used TB for many, many years and have never seen this before. TB is not correctly sorting the emails in my Sent box by date. The problem seems to be only in the Sent folder and only with the sort on Date --- sorting on the other columns seems to be OK. And the problem is not with a lot of the emails --- only an occasional email here and there which is not in date order. The problem occurs if I sort in ascending Date order and when I sort in descending Date order. I tried executing the Repair Folder command (in Folder Properties) but that has not fixed the problem. I'm using TB 102.2.2 (64 bit) on a Linux OS.

所有回复 (1)

more options

OK, sorry, I see now that this is evidently part of some changes to TB made recently to keep all of the emails in a thread together in the list. However, it still seems to me that it would have made more sense to show this thread in the list with the most recent date, not the earliest date! This would have kept the list sorted in date order still in date order (with the option to drill down in the thread to see the earlier entries in the thread). Does anyone know the rationale for showing these threads in the list with the date of the first email in the thread? This doesn't seem to make much sense to me. Thanks.